SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (203450)9/18/2006 5:49:14 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
This is not rocket science.

I would venture to guess that the worst culprits causing lung disease after 9/11 were particles like asbestos, tiny particles of metal, tiny particles of rock, etc, in other words, particles of dust, rather than smoke, per se.

In a situation where smoke inhalation or dust inhalation can't be avoided, health and safety require the use of filtration devices. Even a simple bandanna, shirt-tail, t-shirt, bra-cup, whatever, don't be embarrassed, do what it takes to preserve your health.

In dangerous situations like fires, I have read recommendations that you wet the makeshift cloth, even with urine it that's all you have. That's the advice I've given my children, I have no idea whether it works, but in that situation, that's what I'd do.

But firefighters are issued very specialized masks that cover eyes, mouth, and nose, they don't need makeshifts made out of t-shirts.

Why didn't the workers use masks?

I doubt that it was due to "evil corporations who wanted to maximize profit without any consideration for the workers."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext