you mean to say USA did not supply the murderous Saddam with any weapons?
Incredible.
Like Goldman Sachs did not underwrite the REFCO IPO.
Some PR machinery ... a BLOG!!!
Truly Shock and Awe.
:0))))
So, assuming the BLOG is correct, I then wonder who supplied the Iranians :0))))
Perhaps the same chart can be posted to the BLOG on Iran !!!
Why did I find this sundayherald.com "How did Iraq get its weapons? We sold them" so readily available?
... and even more credibly ... gwu.edu "U.S. DOCUMENTS SHOW EMBRACE OF SADDAM HUSSEIN IN EARLY 1980s DESPITE CHEMICAL WEAPONS, EXTERNAL AGGRESSION, HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES"
... and counterpunch.org "How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons"
Hamoon, if you are going to believe in fiction, at least do so with scientific fiction.
Regarding Chavez, <<it's going to be interesting to see how long his popular appeal continues>> means that as long as the appeal continues, he remains legit? even though you firstly responded 'no'?
Chavez's popularity is higher, at the mo, than Bush, so do you mean to say Bush is even less legit than Chavez?
See, Hamoon, when you believe in NYT nonsense, get twisted up in multiple lies from a variety of BLOGS, and further confound the whole mess via your special processing, the result is positively comical.
Chugs, J |
