Actual left/right wing discussion Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (1329)	9/20/2006 11:55:11 AM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) of 10087

I don't see how CBs referring you to authoritative texts qualifies as a banning offense. There is no rule against evasiveness. ihatebullshit.com That would have been OK to post to thames? Because the link says it, not me? The intent of the link doesn't count? If I find an an anti_Muslim screed and post it to you, that's in the clear? Hmmm. Interesting rules. Nor is anyone forced to reason with you. Her posting that to me was quite voluntary. And, may I point out, she had NOT used the "Don't post to me" option. She could have. She didn't. Instead she picks 2 of the many insulting passages in the Bible anf refers me to them. Like that link above. But that doesn't count. Interesting. The rule is against being unreasonable not refusing to participate. So it's OK to post links to anti-Muslim screeds to you or Nazi screeds to Muslims? Or this as I choose? airbrushnow.com.au After all, the guy who wrote the link said it, not me.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next