SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. (Bulls Board)
SLJB 0.000001000-90.0%Jun 4 9:43 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: atm_prophet who wrote (750)9/26/2006 3:53:28 PM
From: SOROS  Read Replies (2) of 1521
 
I can't answer for others. I spoke to 3 different offices. I even got the names of the KPMG CPAs who did the work for Sulja 3 years ago and confirmed this with another office. Perhaps I am more persuasive, but that is a fact, and that is why I sold. I know there must be "bashers" who bet against stocks and therefore talk them down, but I am not one of them. On the other hand, I also know there are the opposite of bashers who ask people to blindly ignore red flags and claim anyone saying anything perceived as negative is a basher and not to be trusted. I understand this too. When you have your own hard-earned money in something, you do not want anything to negatively affect that. All I can say is, if anyone says the information I gave is false or made-up in ANY way, they are 100% lying. The only thing I have read which could be a legitimate excuse for this ONE issue is if a private company held SLJB and that is where the audit is, but I find that highly unlikely because of how clear and precise they were about when they did work for Sulja in the past and how definite they were about them not being a client now. I guess the truth will come out soon.

I remain,

SOROS
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext