citi: MLNM: Millennium Acquires AnorMed-MOZOBIL Complementary But Not Enough HOLD (2) Speculative (S) Mkt Cap: $3,092 mil. September 26, 2006 SUMMARY * MLNM announced the acquisition of AnorMed for $12/share, a 21% premium over the stock's closing price & 40% premium over Genzyme's bid at $8.55/share. The company will commence a cash tender offer valued at $515M.
* Millennium expects that the deal will be dilutive in 2006/07, modestly accretive in 2008, and significantly accretive in 2009. AnorMed's core asset, MOZOBIL, a product for stem cell mobilization for autologous transplants, is currently in ph III studies and expected for launch in 2008.
* The market opportunity for MOZOBIL, a small molecule CXCR4 chemokine antagonist, could be $250M worldwide and $100M in the U.S. alone.
* With $646M in cash, the company will need to undertake financing to fund the deal, in our view. While MOZOBIL is a late stage, complementary product over long-term, we remain concerned that investor expectations for Velcade remain too high near-term. We maintain our cautious view on the stock..
FUNDAMENTALS P/E (12/06E) 293.2x P/E (12/07E) 83.1x TEV/EBITDA (12/06E) 98.9x TEV/EBITDA (12/07E) 56.7x Book Value/Share (12/06E) $6.62 Price/Book Value 1.5x Revenue (12/06E) $453.5 mil. Proj. Long-Term EPS Growth NA ROE (12/06E) 0.5% Long-Term Debt to Capital(a) 4.8% MLNM is in the S&P 400(R) Index. (a) Data as of most recent quarter
SHARE DATA . RECOMMENDATION Price (9/25/06) $10.15 Rating (Cur/Prev) 2S/2S 52-Week Range $11.15-$8.04 Target Price (Cur/Prev) $11.00/$11.00 Shares Outstanding(a) 304.7 mil. Expected Share Price Return 8.4% Div(E) (Cur/Prev) $0.00/$0.00 Expected Dividend Yield 0.0% Expected Total Return 8.4%
OPINION
Today, Millennium announced the acquisition of AnorMed for $12/share, a 21% premium over the stock's closing price and 40% premium over Genzyme's bid at $8.55/share. The company will commence a cash tender offer within 10 days, which is expected to be open for at least 35 days, valued at $515 million. In the event that the transaction between Millennium and AnorMed does not close successfully, Millennium is required to pay a termination fee of $19.5 million.
In terms of the financial impact on Millennium, the company expects the deal to be dilutive in 2006/07, modestly accretive in 2008, and significantly accretive in 2009. However, with $646 milllion in cash and approximately $100 million cash-burn per quarter, the company will need to undertake financing near-term to fund the deal, in our view.
AnorMed's core asset, MOZOBIL, a product for stem cell mobilization in stem cell transplants, is currently in phase III studies and expected for launch in 2008. The market opportunity for MOZOBIL, a small molecule CXCR4 chemokine antagonist, could be $250 million worldwide and $100 million in the U.S., assuming the cost of MOZOBIL at $5,000. Since G-CSF costs $500 per administration for 5-10 days prior to transplantation, we assume pricing of MOZOBIL at the upper end of this range.
Although phase II study yielded impressive results, a few questions remain regarding the use of MOZOBIL for stem cell mobilization, such as whether MOZOBIL can boost stem cell mobilization vs. higher doses of G-CSF than that was used in phase II trials. Ultimately, the success of MOZOBIL will depend on pricing and usage in other indications, such its use as stem cell mobilizer in allogeneic transplants and as a chemotherapy sensitizers in other hematologic malignancies, such as acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, allogeneic transplants are associated with high mortality, related to fungal infections, interstitial pneumonia and graft-vs- host disease, and data for use as chemotherapy sensitizers are too early.
While MOZOBIL is a late stage, complementary product over long-term, we remain concerned that investor expectations for Velcade remain too high near-term. Furthermore, considering the market opportunity in the U.S., Millennium is paying approximately 5x U.S. sales for AnorMed, a high price for a late stage product, in our view. Recall that Genzyme's offer for AnorMed was valued at $367 million, or 40% less than Millennium's bid.
Despite the addition of a late stage, complentary product to its porfolio, we remain concerned that investor expectations for Velcade remain too high near- term. Moreover, the AnorMed acquisition will be a dilutive event for the next few years and investors will not reap the benefits MOZOBIL until 2008. We maintain a cautious view on the stock.
MOZOBIL HAS IMPRESSIVE PHASE II DATA
For many non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM) patients, autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation has emerged as a potential life-saving treatment. The marrow recovery depends largely on HPC mobilization for collection by apheresis into the circulation from the bone marrow. Thus, many transplant centers have a established a minimal cell dose, 1 million to 2 million CD34+ (hematopoietic) cells/kg, in order to proceed to transplantation (note that ideal cell dose target is considered to be ~5 million CD34+ cells/kg). A common approach to mobilize HPC is to administer granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), which produces myeloid hyperplasia in the marrow and, therefore, leads to more HPCs in circulation.
In a phase II study involving 24 patients who served as their own control, AMD3100 (MOZOBIL) was evaluated in combination with G-CSF (A + G) vs G-CSF alone (G). The combination of A + G proved to be superior to G alone in several ways:
* Higher number of CD34+ cells mobilized into circulation, which translated into higher daily collections of CD34+ cells from apheresis in all patients
* A + G was superior mobilizing HPC than G alone, irrespective of which regimen was administered first.
* Many of the patients were able to collect appreciably more (50% or more increase) CD34+ cells, despite requiring fewer apheresis procedures to complete the collections.
* 20 patients receiving A + G achieved the optimal 5 million CD34+ cells/kg vs. 8 receiving G only.
Clinically, the above results would translate into effective mobilization of patients who failed to mobilize with G alone, reducing the number of apheresis procedures required to reach the minimal HPC dose and reducing the number of apheresis procedures required to reach the optimal HPC dose.
The phase II study also demonstrated that HPC mobilization effect achieved by MOZOBIL was greater in NHL than with MM, although the total number of patients in the study were too small to draw any conclusions.
PHASE III STUDIES ARE ONGOING TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY OF MOZOBIL
Currently, there are two ongoing phase III studies evaluating A + G vs. G alone in two cancer populations: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). The NHL study (n=300) is about 92% enrolled (expected to complete enrollment by year-end) while the MM study (n=300) is fully enrolled, with the results in both studies expected in 2007. Both studies are randomized, double- blinded, active control, parallel assignment, safety/efficacy studies.
The primary endpoint in the NHL study is a stem cell collection target of greater than or equal to 5 million CD34+ cells/kg in four or less days of apheresis while the primary endpoint in the MM study is a stem cell collection target of greater than or equal to 6 million CD34+ cells/kg in two or less days of apheresis. The study endpoints and statistical analysis for the phase III program are based on results from phase II program on MOZOBIL as well as historical data from standard stem cell mobilization regimens using G-CSF alone. Based on this data, each Phase III study is powered to show a minimum of a 20% difference between the study arms, with an assumption that 20% of patients in the control arm will meet the primary endpoint.
DESPITE IMPRESSIVE PHASE II RESULTS FEW QUESTIONS REMAIN
Although phase II study yielded impressive results, a few questions remain regarding future trials. First, although the data did not suggest a significant delay in platelet recovery, future studies will be required to define the pace of platelet recovery more precisely, since the phase II study was less rigorous in requiring daily platelet counts after discharge. White cell or platelet engraftment, a process in which the transplanted cells start to grow and make new blood cells, is important when evaluating the outcome of stem cell transplants.
Secondly, some evidence suggests that higher doses of G-CSF can be used than that was used in the phase II study. Whether MOZOBIL can boost stem cell mobilization vs. higher doses of G-CSF will need to be determined. Since Millennium is most likely to price MOZOBIL at a premium if approved, there is an economic incentive to use a cheaper alternative if higher doses of G-CSF can increase HPC mobilization as effective as MOZOBIL.
Finally, in healthy volunteers, administration of a single dose of MOZOBIL resulted in a mobilization of comparable number of CD34+ cells into circulation as 4 days of G-CSF. This data coupled with that of phase II raise questions about whether MOZOBIL can be used alone to mobilize stem cells in hematologic cancer patients or in healthy volunteering for allogeneic transplantation. In terms of pricing and market opportunity, this characteristic could bode well for Millennium.
ULTIMATELY THE SUCCESS OF MOZOBIL WILL DEPEND ON PRICING AND USAGE IN OTHER INDICATIONS
Although Millennium gave no guidance on MOZOBIL pricing, the company cited economic aspects of stem cell transplants and its complications as a reason for potential premium pricing. The management cited that stem cell transplants are very expensive. Moreover, transplant failure can lead to longer hospital stays, higher mortality and postoperative complications, all which lead to higher medical costs.
If the phase III trials can reproduce phase II results, we can envisage broad MOZOBIL usage with G-CSF in all patients undergoing stem cell transplants, not just for the 60-80% of patients who are poor mobilizers.
The market opportunity for MOZOBIL, a small molecule CXCR4 chemokine antagonist, could be $250 million worldwide and $100 million in the U.S., assuming the cost of MOZOBIL at $5,000, in our view. In the U.S., we estimate that there are 20,000 transplants done annually while 25,000 procedures are undertaken in Europe.
Since G-CSF costs $500 per administration for 5-10 days, we assume premium pricing at the upper end of this range. Furthermore, pricing premium could be greater if future studies prove than MOZOBIL can be used alone as a monotherapy without G-CSF.
Other possible opportunities for for MOZOBIL are its use as stem cell mobilizer in allogeneic transplants and as chemotherapy sensitizers in other hematologic malignancies, such as acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, allogeneic transplants are associated with high mortality, related to fungal infections, interstitial pneumonia and graft-vs- host disease, and data for use as chemotherapy sensitizers are too early to tell.
VALUATION
Our $11 target price is based on an average of three different valuation metrics: 1) 35x our discounted 2008 pro forma EPS estimate of $0.32; 2) 7x our discounted EV-to-projected 2008 revenue estimate of $536 million ($570 million previously); and 3) a ten-year DCF analysis.
A multiple of 35x our discounted 2008 EPS estimate is below the multiple of the large-cap, profitable biotech group's next-12-months' multiple of 44x, which has historically (over the last ten years) been in a range from a high-20s to low-40s multiple excluding historical bubble years within the sector. We believe the growth challenges and encroaching competition to Velcade from Celgene's Revlimid merit this discount to the peer multiple. This implies an $11 target price.
We used a 20% discount rate in this calculation to account for the risk associated with this projected revenue stream. The higher discount rate is applicable due to encroaching competition from Revlimid. We apply a 20% discount rate to mature commercial products whose revenue stream is facing stable but facing increasing risks as outlined in our note "Visiting Valuation" published on May 26, 2004.
Our work shows that amultiple of 7x represents a discount to the 14x historical EV-to-revenue multiple for the mid-cap biotech group, (which has traded within a range from a high-single digit to teens multiple over the last ten years, given our anlaysis). We believe this discount is appropriate given the upcoming competition to Velcade as well as the lack of acceleration in Velcade sales. We also used a 20% discount rate in this analysis. This implies a $12 target price.
In our ten-year DCF analysis, we use a 10% discount rate. This discount rate reflects a 10% cost of equity, 10% weighted average cost of capital (WACC), and 1.46 five-year, weekly-adjusted beta. We assume a 15% debt and 85% equity as our target capital structure. The cost of debt is 9%, a percent higher than cost on non-investment grade debt. Finally, we project a 3% terminal growth rate. This implies an $11 target price.
RISKS
We rate Millennium Pharmaceuticals Speculative risk due to the company's reliance on Velcade, a product that is facing significant competition from Celgene's Revlimid.
On the revenue side, Velcade is the main growth driver of the company. The drug has contended with a deceleration in growth and has yielded lackluster results in most solid tumors. While Velcade is in Phase III development in multiple myeloma, it is behind Revlimid in the race to yield data in the lucrative front-line setting. Data from ongoing studies in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma are not expected until late 2007/early 2008. If sales fail to reaccelerate or impact of Revlimid is greater than we forecast, our financial forecasts would not be met. Conversely, if Velcade has a greater penetration in the use as a second- or a third-line treatment, our forecasts could be surpassed.
In our view, the company's goal to reach profitability on a non-GAAP basis in 2006 creates execution risk. This is because a substantial increase in revenues must be achieved with a concomitant tight control of expenses to reach this goal. If the company fails to achieve this goal, than the stock could perform under our expectations.
If the impact of these risk factors turns out to be greater than we anticipate, the shares may have difficulty achieving our target price. Conversely, if the impact from the risk factors has less of an impact than we envision, the stock may exceed our target price.
INVESTMENT THESIS
Millennium is a drug development company focused on oncology and inflammation. The company has had a checkered history of drug development that was compensated for by successful acquisitions. In 1999, Millennium acquired LeukoSite, thereby gaining rights to Velcade. In 2003, Velcade became Millennium's main growth driver after receiving approval for use in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Velcade has recently faced growth constraints due to high market penetration and is bound to face competition from Celgene's Revlimid over the next few months. While the company has restructured to closely assimilate revenues with expenses and should become profitable in 2006, we remain cautious due to these competitive overhangs. In our view, future success of the stock pivots on success of several pipeline projects. However, we believe that that these projects are too early in development to materially impact the stock over the next 12 months.
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
Millennium Pharmaceuticals (MLNM) is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of novel therapeutics for oncology, and inflammation. In 2003, Velcade, a first-in-class proteosome inhibitor, received FDA accelerated approval for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Millennium has seven other projects in clinical development focusing on inflammation and oncology.
MILLENNIUM QUARTERLY P&L ($MMS)
Source: CIR
MILLENNIUM ANNUAL P&L ($MMS)
Source: CIR
U.S. MULTIPLE MYELOMA MODEL
Source: Citigroup Investment Research and Company reports EX-U.S. MULTIPLE MYELOMA MODEL
Source: Citigroup Investment Research and Company reports
ANALYST CERTIFICATION APPENDIX A-1
I, Yaron Werber, research analyst and |