SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (51678)9/29/2006 4:11:42 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (3) of 90947
 
False Dichotomy

This is one of the oddest false dichotomies I have seen in a long time:

Since 1992, the National Election Study has asked respondents four questions that collectively make up an "authoritarian index." The four questions ask you to specify which of two attributes you value more in children:

1.

Independence vs respect for elders
2.

Self-reliance vs. obedience
3.

Curiosity vs. good manners
4.

Being considerate vs. being well behaved

The first item in each pair marks you as less authoritarian and the second item marks you as more authoritarian. After you've answered all four, the scores are added up and normalized on a scale from 0 to 1, with 1 being the most authoritarian.

It will come as no surprise that authoritarians tend to vote Republican. What may surprise you, though, is that this has only become true in recent years.

I am sure this does not "surprise" Kevin Drum's leftish readers, since they so want to think of themselves as freedom- and individual-rights-loving vs. the mean old Republicans, whom I certainly have no desire to defend on this score.

But are these weird false dichotomies or what?

Why is independence the opposite of respect for elders? Isn't this like saying Kleenex is the opposite of pudding? Isn't the opposite of "independence" actually "the desire to mooch off other people"? Why isn't the opposite of "self reliance" in fact the "desire to have the government run your life for you?" I mean, I personally have strived (striven??) to have my kids simultaneouly be both curious and have good-manners.

And is Drum really trying to argue that Democrats are all about the stuff on the left side while Republicans are for all the stuff on the right? Who in the world is going to believe that the folks who, for example, support Social Security because they think individuals can't be trusted to manage their own retirement savings, are the spokesmen for "independence" and "self-reliance." As I said in my comments to the post:

As a libertarian, I am thrilled to see you championing the cause of anti-authoritarianism and self-reliance. I am sure that this means that we will soon see your opposition to telling people what wages are acceptable, what features their car must have, where they can and can't smoke, who they can or can't hire and fire, where they can get their health care, what schools they are forced to fund, how much fat can be in their diet, what drug risk trade-offs are acceptable, how steep their wheelchair ramps have to be, how energy efficient their appliances have to be, what minimum percentages of minorites must be at their school in their workforce, why they shouldn't be allowed to shop at Walmart or buy from Chinese manufacturers, what lisence they need to braid hair or to sell caskets, etc.

coyoteblog.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext