SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 173.21-3.2%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: 100cfm who wrote (145206)9/30/2006 1:18:57 PM
From: lml  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Q staunchly believes they have not infringed and BRCM staunchly believes the opposite. Therefore a settlement is highly unlikely prior to judgement.

A good # of lawsuits start from the position you describe. But that is no indication that the parties will not settle.

If settlement is in the economic interests of both parties, each will consider settlement throughout the litigation process, including trial, regardless of the belief each has at the outset.

In my view, it is clearly in neither party's interest to take its battle to the mat, as each has to gain from settlement. I think the better question is where a potential settlement lies, closer to Q's position or closer to BRCM's. Each side internally knows where settlement may potentially be reached.

It will be very interesting to see what comes of the 10/4 settlement conference.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext