SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 240.58-2.5%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: fastpathguru who wrote (212138)10/1/2006 2:29:19 PM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
FPG

Yes, and I easily debunked the product of that expertise.

Not in my view. BTW, don't get hurt patting yourself on the back.

Please indicate to me where I stated or implied this "premise."

"Your honor, Billy knew murder was wrong, and he even went to church every Sunday. Therefore, he could not have committed this murder!"

This is where I think you and some others are being intellectually dishonest. You operate from the premise of both crime and guilt when it hasn't even been shown that a crime has taken place. You are not waiting for a crime to be established, you've already moved on to not only the guilt phase, but the appropriate punishment phase. That's intellectually dishonest imo. As such, we are simply wasting bandwidth arguing when we can't even agree on what we're arguing about. You're arguing about the guilt of a crime that hasn't been shown to have happened. To continue is folly.

It will all come out in the wash.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext