Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 233.54

-1.8%

Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Magrathea who wrote (212161)	10/1/2006 5:32:33 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (1) of 275872

Magrathea Mag:Who is being intellectually dishonest? ephud:You are, imo. Getting pretty close to "name calling", my friend. That's not name calling. That's an opinion and I backed it up with reasons. One final time: it is the CAUSE of DEATH that is at issue. And one more time, this metaphor has been stretched too thin. Loss of sales is more of a paper cut and doesn't in itself justify a homicide investigation. My reasoning is that if Intel missed sales AND Intel can link those missed sales to AMD anti-competitive actions, then Intel could file a claim. Then we don't disagree at all. I just don't conclude in this case that AMD has demonstrated anything at this point other than the loss of sales, which you point out could be due to any number of reasons, and I see no reason to presume both crime and guilt in the absence of nothing more than the missed sales. There.. I can keep 5 viable hypothesis going at once. In only 1 of them Intel is guilty in a US court. How's that for intellectual honesty? Can you top that? No need for me to top it. I can respect that explanation. In fact, it's pretty much what I've been saying.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next