Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 176.67

+1.6%

Nov 12 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kech who wrote (145314)	10/2/2006 12:32:18 PM
From: JeffreyHF	Read Replies (1) of 152472

"More complicated" could apply to either, or both, liability and remedy. If liability were found, barring those chipsets could forseeably destroy Verizon, Sprint, and Alltel, and plummet LG, Samsung, Kyocers, MOTO, and others. All for three chip technology patents? Can BRCM refuse to license them to QCOM, while demanding FRAND terms from Qualcomm? Can those patents be circumvented? Are they patents that derived from the failed QCOM/BRCM collaboration, and which may involve what has been alleged to be the theft of QualcommIPR?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next