SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (70868)10/3/2006 6:43:04 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) of 110194
 
I half agree with you, its just that I remember when I was trying to buy a house in the early 90s with a high income, in those days these DTI ratios actually were observed and I thought it was *total BS*.

I don't need the government telling me, a single person at the time, that I need 10K/mo leftover for my personal needs. I had zero expenses and viewed my situation as favorable to the highest mortgage possible. In retrospect I would have been better off had I been able to mortgage 75% of my income, then. I was only 28!

I understand that bubbles are problematic but this 35% DTI has got to go, it discriminates against high income singles, and is a sweeping judgement on lifestyle. Maybe a higher DTI like 50% along with FICO would work. Anyway jmo.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext