SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (79705)10/3/2006 9:25:09 PM
From: CogitoRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
>>Not having WMDs isn't the point. The bottom line is that there was serious reasons to be concerned that he would have eventually had them again. Esp. chemical weapons. The production equipment is basicly the same as that used for the production of pesticides (and can be alternated between the two). Large stockpiles of chemical weapons might have been detected, but the ability to produce new weapons would always be there, and the moment the sanctions plus inspections regime fell apart new weapons could quickly be created.<<

Tim -

You're the one who's missing the point. A preemptive war against an enemy who may become dangerous at some point in the future is simply wrong.

- Allen
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News