2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 398.57

-0.2%

Dec 18 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: elmatador who wrote (9907)	10/8/2006 2:09:59 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) of 218594

ElM, of course there was some fallout, but it was trivial. It didn't really reach recession levels. In particular industries it was serious - those who had grown accustomed to a very high pay rate came back to Earth. But there was not cascading collapse into Teotwawki levels, which it was asserted there would be. 2001 was NOT a collapse overall. Hardly anyone around the world noticed anything much in their daily lives. It was just the fancy people in the Biotelecosmictechdot.com sectors that had some adjustment back to normal levels. Big deal. Sure, I took a pasting, but the average Kiwi wouldn't have noticed much if anything. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next