The question was about Intel's mandatory anti-trust law training for their sales and marketing people. Plantlife couldn't believe Intel does it and even accused Golfbum of being a flat-out liar. That tells you more about Plantlife than anything else.
_____________________
Apparently you are used to making judgments with half the story, but the other half was, the G-bum making an extrapolation that since all this schooling was done, it meant there was no violations of the law.
He refused to accept my comment that he could speak for only one Intel employee out of 100,000, namely himself. I asked him to read the brief, so he would know what he was talking about, but he stuck to his lame argument.
That being an obvious intransigent attitude was the reason I challenged his claim to be an Intel employee. On a message board such as this, we have people claiming to be lawyers also, but there is no proof required, and each must be taken on faith, and when there is none, on ones best judgment.
Anyway, the thing that bothers you about me, is my preference for AMD. I could post here and lie through my teeth about Intel's Quad Core Chip, and that would be great in your biased opinion. So, your negative opinion is in my view, a compliment, and the comment you just posted, another character assassination, similar to the one your ally made. |
