Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 233.54

-1.8%

Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Petz who wrote (213025)	10/9/2006 1:38:40 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (1) of 275872

By Intel employee's silence, I am assuming that Intel did NOT teach that it was illegal, and therefore expect AMD to win the case on that ground alone, probably the most serious of all the charges in the suit. Petz You don't need any help to convince yourself that Intel is guilty. Your mind is made up so why bother rehashing this point? Let me ask you this, considering that you are absolutely convinced that Intel had a policy of violating the law, how do you think this policy was conveyed to those who carried it out? There was obviously a team of highly paid lawyers with very indepth knowledge in anti-trust law, so how did they train those sales people on how to break the law? Was it done on US soil or off shore outside US jurisdiction? How was this carried out? OR is it your position that they just didn't really know the law as well as you do?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next