Again, that's AMD's spin. AMD says Intel gave rebates X, and those rebates were for Y. Intel says yes X happened but they were for Z not Y. Both agree on X but disagree on if it was for Y or Z. You have seen no evidence, you've only heard AMD's spin and yet you've swallowed it hook, line and sinker. That's prejudice by definition. Wait for the facts. It will all come out in the wash.
Dude, I'm going to argue like you now. Here goes:
<elmer_style>No, that's YOUR spin, I'm not spinning, you are. You don't
even know anything about what Intel has done. You just swallow
whatever Intel gives you, and regurgitate it on command. AMD
says X, Intel says !X. Intel is guilty. We have to wait for the
trial to find out. Too bad you can't understand that. You're
so biased it's ridiculous. By definition!
Intel's dirty laundry will be aired. </elmer_style>
Gosh, that was so easy! I didn't even have to think while writing it, let alone read and actually attempt to understand or respond to your argument! I should bookmark this post and use it as a template for all further communication with you, as you seem to have done! I feel a new era of enlightened conversation will ensue!
Please, stop talking like a damn 'bot, if possible.
fpg |
