SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (2527)10/10/2006 3:15:13 PM
From: Keith Feral  Read Replies (2) of 10087
 
I think the aclu have let themselves be manipulated by the government to act against religious freedom in this country to preserve the separation of church and state. It's a liberal contradiction of tyranny of the masses to protect the rights of the individual. If the aclu is violating the civil rights of most people in this country to practice religious freedom to protect the interests of big government, they are doing the opposite of what's in the best interests of mankind.

It's understandable that they aclu has committed themselves to the interests of the minority, who go against everything they view as an expression of social conservatives from the ultra right wing Christian coalition. It's totally obvious these liberals make no attempt to cover up their contempt for people seeking to preserve their freedom of religion. The aclu considers religious derision as open game and openly reject any religious pov as being a threat to their alternative interests.

You can look at a person and tell if a person in a woman or a minority, but you can't bring up the subject of God. It is exceedingly difficult to protect civil rights that are bound by emotion, though they are no less important than sex or race. For the most part, people are inclined to act as if religious attitudes don't exist. It goes back to a great point that you made. Why have we made our religious beliefs so intolerant that we are completely inhibited from expressing our faith and reason?

Two words come to mind - judgement and intolerance. If we are going to restore religious order, there must be a universal respect. Religion has done the exact opposite of integrating spiritualism on a global level by failing to encourage faith and reason as free will except through compulsion. Logic and reason have not always been the pillars of free will for Christian faith. Rather, compulsion to religion has been stewarded by an attempt to enforce salvation from the fiery consequences of doom.

Religious free will can't take place through the unification of all beliefs. Religious pluralism can only be created the the universal respect that all religions are equally important to clarify faith and logic so that every man can . The best that we can do is accept a universal hope for religious thinking. Maybe if the Church accepts the reality of religion as an expression of free will, not a prevention of spiritual damnation, we can move closer to a universal tolerance for many religious schools of belief.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext