SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. - A Scam?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Diamond Daze who wrote (1657)10/12/2006 2:54:31 AM
From: anniebonny  Read Replies (1) of 4624
 
What huge naked short position? the first "reported" NOBO was incorrect. There never were that many shares shorted. They just went poof. There certainly were not 75 million shares that covered between the dates of these two lists. So where did they go? they were never there in the first place. It was a magic trick - now you see it now you don't.

dates on the website.
9/13/2006
#nobo = 15,184
# of shares = 106,405,424
DTCC # = 30,918,339 ( reported on 9/19/06)

10/03/06
#nobo = 4,911
#shares = 39,278,507
DTCC # 37,589,733 ( as reported on 9/29/06)

Why the difference in # shareholders?
Why the difference in #shares?

refer to my post where I reposted the post from a shareholder and the proof that a shareholder had received the info pre Mike alexanders rant on that interview that ADP had no right disclosing that info to a shareholder and that they all knew the number was wrong and never reported it or changed it on the website. Mike said it was ADP fault, so they should be liable.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News