SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: axial who wrote (17074)10/13/2006 2:13:10 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (1) of 46821
 
Hi Jim. How's this for policy-making at work?
---

FCC Postpones Vote on AT&T + BellSouth by One Day

[FAC: As found at convergedigest.com . Yesterday's report headlined as follows: DOJ Approves AT&T + BellSouth without Conditions. The U.S. Department of Justice approved the pending acquisition of BellSouth by AT&T without imposing any conditions.]

The FCC postponed consideration of the proposed AT&T + BellSouth merger by one day to allow last minute negotiations between FCC Commissioners. On Wednesday and Thursday a number of prominent Democratic congressmen expressed their dismay when the Department of Justice (DOJ) failed to impose any conditions on the transaction. Media speculation held that the two Democratic commissioners (Copps and Adelstein) were seeking to have Net Neutrality and consumer protection provisions included as part of any FCC approval of the merger. The issue is now expected to be considered at an FCC meeting scheduled for Friday, October 13.

fcc.gov | 12-Oct-06
-------

Putting aside for a moment what, for the most part, is a sham, the question that I have is this: What specific "Net Neutrality and consumer protection" provisions would the Democratic commissioners have included, given the kind of double-edged minefield that proposing any neutrality rules, at all, has become?

FAC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext