Expand on the word "massive". How many is "massive"?
If we consider the minimal amount, initially I would presume more than one.
We shouldn't consider fractional amounts - although some people are greater than others, we consider all to be equal and one.
Let's assume the first premise, that massive should be a number greater than one.
After all, two is twice one and compared to one, it is a lot and quite possible to consider that number to be massive. But lets try another tack and revisit one.
One is infinitely greater than zero, multiplicably speaking - multiply zero by anything and you still get zero. Therefore anything greater than zero must be massive. As a test, you can try to multiply zero by infinity. What you'll get is a massive number of red-faced mathematicians running after you with machetes. In this case "massive" would be a quantity significantly greater than one. But even if you had a bleary eyed mathematicians running after you with a pencil, that would still constitute a massive number of them.
Therefore, one could be considered massive. QED.
So in conclusion, that must be what that guy whose name must not be mentioned considers to be a "massive" lawsuit. |
