Network Associates (NET) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Network Associates (NET)

NET 204.06

-0.1%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kalyanaraman who wrote (1196)	9/26/1997 5:15:00 PM
From: Joanna Tsang	of 6021

Which one? The one for copyright or the slander suit against SYMC? ;-) The copyright one, I don't know. I don't believe MCAF did anything wrong, but my experience with law tells me it's not what's the truth, but what does the judge believe. Of course, there also strategic, monetary, and personal factors. (How many of you believe that Marv Albert did what this woman accused him of? Never mind...bad example...) :-) MCAF will have to come up with the URL address of the public domain site where the "code in question" is in order to disprove SYMC's claim, in my opinion. Short of that, I don't know. It's very difficult to prove someone stole code unless you have facts to back it up...and I don't see anything on either side. I had mentioned that I see a slander suit on this thread minutes before MCAF's press release suing SYMC for slander came out. (Look at the last paragraph on my posting.) My posting: techstocks.com MCAF's posting: techstocks.com If it's that blatant to dopey me (and I'm not very experience in lawsuits), there is no question that MCAF will win the slander suit. Cheers, Joanna

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next