Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7043)	10/13/2006 11:25:28 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) of 224707

GW Bush would never be considered for any political office without his famous last name. He has traded on his father's power, Saudi and oil money and famous last name all his life. In fact he is the least qualified president we have ever seen and is not interested in working hard, serving the people or doing his homework. If the GOP suddenly thinks running sons of famous fathers is wrong, then why did they pick GW Bush over a much more honest and qualified candidate like John McCain? Hmm? And why did they turn a blind eye to the outrageous smear campaign Bush-Rove ran against McCain's heroic military service, including calling him a traitor and coward, just like they did John Kerry and others? Hmm? Santorum is perhaps the top GOP senator responsible for K Street corruption inside the senate. He is a dishonest and corrupt man who has no business being allowed or trusted to hold office. His charity PAC is also nothing but a political slush fund. And he got a $500,000 loan from a contributor's bank though that bank has a policy of only loaning to very rich individuals, and Santorum can't even afford to pay off the loan.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next