2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 389.05

+0.4%

Dec 10 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (10108)	10/15/2006 1:21:19 AM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (1) of 218386

The UK has a similar strategic depth problem, they solved it with missle launching subamrines which can be far away, Of course, Canada is also a fall back position... Japan has the ability to develop an enormous nuclear 'sting' which could deter aggression by China or Russia. 15 + tons of plutonium goes pretty far. It would be more than enough to take out a large part of the North Korea hierarchy and their military capability. Would China or Russia then want to hit Japan ? If Taiwan is not worth Los Angeles, what's North Korea worth ? Japan is a major part of the value creation, consumption, and financing for Asia. I don't see China risking economic progress for the Hermit Kingdom. Russia is a different matter, but North Korea isn't enough of a client state to really matter. I don't think Japan would launch a first strike against North Korea. I think they are in a situation analangous to France in the 1950s, they realized that they could not count on the United States if the Soviets attacked. France built a capability to take out the major cities in Russia.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next