SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (2904)10/16/2006 7:46:18 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) of 10087
 
In the case of music, there is no evolutionary mechanism that I can think of or that anyone else can offer.

Some biologists hypothesize that Neanderthals sang, but did not speak.

Others hypothesize that singing evolved as language evolved, as a means of communicating, e.g., mothers singing to babies, very relaxing, stress-relieving, even in the womb. Another example, work songs, which keep groups in sync.

Others who have a bent for both math and music (the two go together) hypothesize that music ability is a side effect of the development of math abilities.

My opinion -- all of the above are possible, but it's also true that humans enjoy creating beauty. In fact, although it may be --- hmm, what's the word, something like "self centered" -- anthropologists use the deliberate creation of symbols and the use of decoration as the dividing line between "not human like us" and "human like us." Cave painting, tattoos, decorating the dead, making and wearing beads.

We create beauty because we can.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext