SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7205)10/16/2006 11:24:37 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) of 224713
 
President Washington declined to run after two terms. Do you think he had everything he wanted to accomplish completed in that time? A constant churning of representation would prevent much of the inbreeding and sclerosis clogging the artery of our budgetary process. There was a brief Op Ed in today’s WSJ about the number of people testifying for versus against various congressional programs in hearings. Apparently the ratio exceeded 20 to 1 for expanding programs and praising them.

<sarcasm>With testimony stroking the ever hungry egos of the senile egomaniacs in Washington, why would they think they were being egalitarian by spending more on federal programs? </sarcasm>

I don't care how perilous the times, we need a constant changing of the guard in Washington to reduce the ability of elected officials to become entrenched. It would get rid of KKK Byrd and Teddy Hic Kennedy.

We need two Amendments: A Balanced Budget Amendment would make it more difficult for politicians to have our grandchildren's cake and eat it too. A Term Limits Amendment would ensure that elected officials couldn't overstay their welcome.

Oh, and sorry if I didn't call you a liar or otherwise insult anybody. <g>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext