SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (206160)10/17/2006 12:42:53 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Um, if that'a blotter, you might be confusing your version of reality with objective reality. ;^)

According to the US Constitution, the President is commander in chief of the military and for reasons best known to themselves, the Framers also gave the President carte blanche in foreign policy, subject solely to the limitation that the Senate has to ratify treaties.

If you're too young to remember when Democrat controlled Congresses attempted to reign in Republican Presidents like Nixon and Reagan, or weren't actually paying attention, you might be on a front row seat for a refresher course on Congress vs. Presidents, assuming that the Dems win both the House and the Senate in 2006.

And James Baker wrote the book on defying Congress, and Dubya had a front row seat of his own, right in the White House, and he was paying attention.

Bottom line, the branches of government are separate but equal. Congress doesn't tell the President how to be President, and the President doesn't tell Congress how to be Congress.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext