Sioux Nation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation

DJT 11.08

-2.5%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ManyMoose who wrote (83423)	10/18/2006 2:13:56 AM
From: worksinjammies	Read Replies (2) of 361441

...because it doesn't eliminate habeas corpus for anyone who is entitled to it. Foriegn combatants are not entitled. The law says nothing about a requirement that an enemy combatant need be a foriegner at all. Also, it has a very wide definition of what it means to be an enemy combatant. The definition could apply to anyone who the President says. Look at the language, it is there that you will find the rub. Don't come crying when Osama drops an egg on your face. There is absolutely no assurance that this law will do ANYTHING to prevent the types of activity you are suggesting. It will however, ensnare many people that would not fall into the suggested targets of the law, for example, those who would dissent against our own gov't domestically within their "rights" of free speech. Now that is truly scary. Look at this Keith Obermann clip to shed a little light: movies.crooksandliars.com Regards, WIJ

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next