| | I don't have a problem with that comment. You've been in the market for a long time. SLJB gives more info than 90% of the pinkies. It may, may, may, IF you believe them, be taking that step to the OTC BB land, and, in which case your comments will be moot.
The point is that one can Generically Bash just about any stock.
As for MMGG, I spent a small amount of time showing that it can be bashed based on potential dilution, lack of a realistic business plan, given cash needed vs. cash on hand.
If your point is that otc bb is less risk in general than pinkies or even that, at this point, MMGG is less risk than SLJB, I would agree. With higher risk comes higher return.
But, those of us who invest know those risks and don't need generic bashers to point out obvious risks as they do so often in coordination.
It's similar to someone posting that your MMGG is inferior to XOM for obvious reasons.
Some of the one line, hit and run sheeple here, will say that I favor the approach of pink market because I happen to buy. I have often posted that I would prefer changes to the whole market, and that in the forefront would be effective and efficient disclosure, not necessarily along the lines of SOX, but stuff that makes sense financially.
My posts for full disclosure in the FTD area, the NSScamming, etc., are consistent with what I would urge for changes in the pinkie market.
Best to you too! |
|
