Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: marcos who wrote (23064)	10/19/2006 1:04:03 AM
From: jackjc	Read Replies (1) of 78418

marcos, right on all points. I think of them together also as both are world class projects. Metalline seems almost certain to go into production, CUU much more iffy. Infrastructure excellent for MMGG, non-existent for CUU which will not have local workers, though the overtime rules now make 14 day rotations practical. (Previous majors exploring Schaft would have had killer overtime prod costs IMO). Maybe a major difference, the Sierra Mojada manto being feased has about a 10 yr life (we will know when the mine plan is released) but Schaft Creek could possibly be mined for 50 yrs, depending on metal prices, it is that big. Though MMGG has more zinc beyond the fease, and could find lots more. The Samsonite manto has about another 35% alone.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next