Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)

SIRI 20.77

-2.2%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pcstel who wrote (5380)	10/21/2006 12:52:52 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 8420

>>> Do you have any data sources to support that the information that I provided is incorrect?? Talk about reading comprehension problems! I provided a press release from Sirius explaining their reason for launching a fourth satellite (GEO, by the way) because their reception sucks. As I pointed out in the same post, if you don't count the fact that Sirius has ended up having to have TWO MORE SATELLITEs (and we still don't know that it will provide adequate reception for them), maybe you can call it cost effective. But the argument that it would provide better (or even as good) reception is just utter nonsense. We know what the facts are, and the facts are that Sirius has major problems with delivering the product to the consumer. And XM doesn't have those problems. Why do you have to be corrected on these matters time and time and time again?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next