Classic TA Workplace Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (137739)	10/21/2006 4:11:08 PM
From: The Freep	Read Replies (1) of 209892

OT -- Admittedly, at least they are focusing on a clear statistic that isn't open to data-massaging. And it is also one that intuitively makes a lot of sense. But it strikes me as one that is also somewhat self-selecting, particularly this year as we read about different parties debating whether to spend money in different races based on what they view as the chances of winning. If it were as clear as the bigger warchest, then the party/national committees wouldn't have to think twice. So again, it's not quite as cut and dried in my mind. We COULD of course, argue Barron's point that "conventional wisdom" said what they claim it said, but that'd be a different point entirely (though one they've set themselves up for by claiming a kind of superiority). I must admit, though, that I enjoy the e-wave analysis of the Iowa contract, because we all are well aware that it has absolutely no bearing on anything. And it's way more fun having "political" conversations that aren't about politics!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next