SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Max90's LINK STORAGE to stock quotes

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (1204)10/23/2006 3:26:41 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (1) of 3906
 
Let's hear what an ACTUAL adviser to Bush is saying about all the news that implies a new "retreat and declare victory" policy.
This is WH planned counter move(as Bartlett was all over the place this morning, this was OFFICIAL WH and NOT the other goberment led by Baker) to this weekend's CFR's promoted medal blitz(it was NOT a Bush planned media blitz)

<<Bush adviser: Iraq policy more than 'stay the course'
POSTED: 12:44 p.m. EDT, October 23, 2006

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- As the U.S. death toll in Iraq reached 86, the highest monthly total this year, a senior White House adviser Monday rejected suggestions that U.S. troops were exacerbating problems in Iraq and that a timetable should be set to withdraw forces from the war-torn nation.

"Just because we have taken some serious sacrifices this month and that the fighting has been remarkably violent, that doesn't make it any less necessary for us to be there and make sure we prevail," Bush adviser Dan Bartlett told CNN.

"Most people would argue we are part of the solution in Iraq, not part of the problem,"
Bartlett said. "Our commanders are there on the ground, seeing the situation play out hour by hour, are constantly evaluating that very question. Where is the best and most appropriate use of forces?"

Bartlett made his rounds Monday morning among several news outlets after a report by The New York Times said diplomats and military commanders were setting timetables for disarming militias and other goals.

Bartlett said the newspaper report was "overwritten" because it suggested the timetable was part of a new strategy. He conceded it had been a "difficult month" in Iraq, but insisted "it doesn't make it any less necessary that we prevail."

"[The Iraqis] want to have this benchmark and milestone process as much as we do. They want to take over control as quickly as possible," he said. "The president has constantly said it's going to be up to the commanders on the ground to give him advice about what our troop strength should be. It's important that we do it in a way that doesn't prematurely pull our troops out before we're able to succeed."

Bartlett said the problems in Iraq require not only a military solution, but solutions from a "political standpoint" as well.

Several facets of the Iraq war require benchmarks, including improving the capabilities of Iraqi police and security forces, and resolving the country's oil and reconciliation issues, Bartlett said.

In an interview with ABC News, Bartlett expanded on how to prod the Iraqi government into meeting the benchmarks and milestones, saying the U.S. is looking to "incentivize them to take control and give command-and-control operations exclusively to the Iraqi security forces."

"We do have a lot of reconstruction funds, for example," Bartlett said. "And if you have a solid political structure in place in a secure climate, then that way you can have money go into there."

In another interview with CBS's "Early Show," Bartlett dismissed assertions that the Bush administration's strategy for Iraq is to "stay the course."

"It's never been a stay-the-course strategy," Bartlett said. "Strategically, we think it's very important that we stay in Iraq and we win in Iraq. And if we were to cut and run and go and leave that country too early it would be a disaster for American policy."

"But what we aren't doing is sitting there with our heads in the sand. We're completely changing and making tactical changes on a week-by-week basis as we respond to the enemy's reactions to our strategies," the presidential adviser said. (Watch why Bush doesn't think leaving Iraq is a viable strategy -- 1:52 cnn.com )

Throughout the war, the Bush administration has said it's critical to "stay the course" in Iraq.

Bush used the phrase August 30, saying in a speech in Utah, "If we leave the streets of Baghdad before the job is done, we will have to face the terrorists in our own cities. We will stay the course, we will help this young Iraqi democracy succeed, and victory in Iraq will be a major ideological triumph in the struggle of the 21st century."

White House spokesman Tony Snow made similar remarks to reporters in August: "You also cannot be a president in a wartime and not realize that you've got to stay the course."

However, in a speech last year, Bush said the phrase could represent and misrepresent his thinking on Iraq.

"Some critics continue to assert that we have no plan in Iraq except to stay the course," Bush said in November 2005.

"If by stay the course, they mean we will not allow the terrorists to break our will, they are right. If by stay the course, they mean we will not permit al Qaeda to turn Iraq into what Afghanistan was under the Taliban -- a safe haven for terrorism and a launching pad for attacks on America -- they are right, as well," the president said. "If by stay the course, they mean that we're not learning from our experiences, or adjusting our tactics to meet the challenges on the ground, then they're flat wrong.">>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext