Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)

SIRI 20.77

-2.2%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kovachs who wrote (5405)	10/23/2006 9:04:38 PM
From: pcstel	Read Replies (3) of 8420

Completely wrong You and your bunk mate seem to share the same propensity to claim that I am WRONG even though the data shows that I am Right. In order to find a basis of CPGA costs per type of Gross Add. You must find a point in the metrics where either OEM or Retail additions become more pronounced. In XM's case, this occurred in Q4 2005. 87% of net adds came from retail. XM's CPGA expenses zoomed to ~$130 due to their high retail add rate. Now, these are the FACTS. And They are... Irrefutable. Now you have provided lots of EXCUSES as to why retail CPGA was higher than OEM in Q4 as the Financial Statements clearly show. But, they are simply that.. Excuses.. So you can not claim I am WRONG and then claim that the reason I am wrong is not because my verifiable data points presented in the SEC statements are wrong.. But, more so.. Because you think that your excuses somehow discredit the actual FACTS presented in the SEC statements. How is that possible that the 4th quarter with the massive influx of retail subscribers has a higher CPGA than the 2nd quarter which was almost split 50-50 between retail and oem subs? LOL!! Having a hard time on keeping your story straight???? OEM is higher.. No I mean.. Retail is higher.. NO!!! I mean OEM.. LOL!! Which one is it?? Here's a puzzle for you. Sirius CPGA in the 4th quarter $188. Sirius CPGA in the 2nd quarter $231. How is that possible that the 4th quarter with the massive influx of retail subscribers has a higher CPGA than the 2nd quarter which was almost split 50-50 between retail and oem subs? Well, when we start to figure out a puzzle, when need to collect the FACTS, and seperate the OPINIONS from the actual FACTS. (You'll learn this if you watch those forensic shows on cable) You claim as a FACT. that SIRI's CPGA in the fourth Quarter of last year was $188, and CPGA in the 2nd quarte was $231. Now, I have never seen any CPGA figures provided by Sirius. So I would have to ask you to provide the SEC statements or company press releases that can verify these data points. Nothing worse than starting out with bogus information from less than credible sources. Now don't tell me that these are you and your Bunk mates self-calculated numbers?? I mean.. Your bunky can't even keep track of how many repeaters SIRI has, and just makes up numbers (multiplied by a fator of 100%) because they sound good.. So that doesn't leave too much credibility on those "self-calculated Bitter Bagmemberz" CPGA numbers he has self-proclaimed as being correct??? Now does it?? Is there 133 repeaters or 266?? I guess it doesn't really matter when you are going to provide "self calculated" numbers spawned from BITTERNESS. The end result is simple.. FACTS are FACTS.. You can't discount FACTS because you have a bunch of EXCUSES. After all, EXCUSES are what Popsicle Stands are all about. Lots and lots of excuses in the Popsicle Stand business. Looks like someone one was getting out of their Popsicle Stand investment today. And so it goes, PCSTEL

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next