SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (307547)10/24/2006 7:53:55 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) of 1574852
 
Do they list the votes they think were important for vets, their position on the issue, and how the people they rank voted? If they do that would clear up what criteria they are using to determine who support the troops.

I find it very telling that you paint the group as partisan just on the basis of the report card without any apparent attempt at figuring out whether they are or not.

If Democrats on the average got better ratings but the ratings where mixed up, with some Republicans ranking high and some Democrats low, than I would be more willing to believe it was non-partisan. But with every single Democrat on the list ahead of every single Republican (see imbeded picture in Ted's post Message 22939322 ), you have pretty good evidence that the determination is partisan. Absolute proof? No but fairly good evidence, and I haven't seen any evidence on the other side of the equasion.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News