SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 393.24+1.1%Dec 11 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Seeker of Truth who wrote (10600)10/26/2006 5:58:45 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 218449
 
<You talk about "Chinese murderous cruelty". This says to me that you are saying murderous cruelty is a typical characteristic of Chinese people. Why not say communist?>

Because China isn't communist now. It's capitalist [sort of]. Or, totalitarian. Anyway, I was discussing CHINESE cruelty and murder, not Soviet or other totalitarianists. That's because TJ goes on about China this and China that and how Taiwan's annexation is inevitable and Tibetan murders are okay [and "hey, everyone's doing it"].

Things of China are Chinese. Because the general culture is murderous totalitarianism doesn't mean all Chinese people are like that. You are being racist to suggest that because a generalisation is true, it's true in specific instances for individuals.

Such racism is not acceptable and I'm surprised that you would be so racist. I thought some of your best friends are Chinese.

You yourself have warned me against possibly slightly getting persons from SI in trouble with the Chinese totalitarians. So I gather you agree with me that by comparison with say Japanese, American or British governments, the Chinese are murderously dangerous. Or maybe you meant he'd get a $10 fine for failing to idolize the Great Leaders of Beijing.

You didn't mean that. You meant he might be disappeared.

Mqurice

PS: You did use "racist" before me, but I used it twice. And have used it lots of times. You also did the first post to me, so I should have a right of reply and be able to claim use of "racist" too. I have now used "racist" four times. No, make that 5! That means I win.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News