Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 179.02

+3.7%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (145848)	10/26/2006 8:30:37 AM
From: rkral	Read Replies (1) of 152472

"If [Judge Rudi M. Brewster] says that Nokia's demand for arbitration, though weak, is not "wholly groundless," he sends the case to the arbitrator for him to decide whether the case is subject to arbitration." Earlier you posted ... "Nokia asks the ITC judge to dissolve the ITC proceeding because there is an arbitration taking place between Nokia and Q in which the infringement issue is being considered by the arbitrator, Les WEINSTEIN." -- Message 22730029 If the arbitration is indeed taking place, that strongly implies Weinstein has already decided "the case is subject to arbitration." The only reason I can thing of ... for court action and arbitration to take place in parallel is to expedite the final result. But that flies in the face of our theory that Nokia's intent is to delay, delay, delay. BTW I never could find text supporting the "Weinstein arbitration" in that ITC filing link you provided. Help please, if you can find the time. TIA, Ron

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next