Kayaker, I plead guilty to injecting politics into that last post of mine....should have left the word "demo" out of it, and let the readers make their own assumptions as to which party would create those conditions which would adversely affect our energy efforts to become less dependent on foreign sources, correct? I apologize to the board. Now your question:
>>>>Aren't you the guy who gets bent out of shape when you see a post that has even the slightest whiff of politics in it?<<<<
Your question is somewhat misleading as to what causes my "bent shape"....primarily it's due to surviving some 79 years, and....secondly, the referred post #73757 was indicating my perception that there is too much treasonous effect to many posts and publications that have been published since our declared war on the Terrorist effort, triggered by their declaration of destruction on us Sept. 11, 2001....that post correctly left it up to the reader to decide who the guilty party/parties are....no mention of political party in the post that I can discern, so you should be able to observe that it is TREASON...not POLITICS... which puts a strain on my otherwise "admirably" erect posture. :<))
Now, kindly trace that thread on back to post #73752, and observe the content of the referenced article, paying particular attention to the Anti-American, Anti-administration bias to it, and make your own conclusions as to whether it inured to the benefit of our Commander-in-Chief's war effort....or....to the emboldenment of the enemies of this country, and the rest of the world which ostensibly desires peace as opposed to the turmoil and suffering caused by Terrorist attacks. Then go to the dictionary and look up the definition of treason...case closed.
Semper Fi to all those interested in defending our country against our declared enemies.
Buck |
