SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RetiredNow who wrote (307842)10/26/2006 9:50:33 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (2) of 1572208
 
In my opinion, Clinton and Carter's performance would carry more weight today as an indication of today's democrat party, than what Roosevelt did 65 years ago. I have Churchill's six volume set, The Second World War, originals from 1948 to 1953. It has a lot of correspondence between Churchill and Roosevelt as well as other leaders. Great stuff. I don't see the current crop of democrats remotely resembling Roosevelt in those letters. I won't waste time listing Clinton's foreign policy disasters or Jimmy Carter's.

Regarding algore and nukes, I've posted his position before, in his own words.
Message 22606928

"However, I do not support an increased reliance on nuclear power."

Clear enough Gore is against nukes? Or has he changed his rhetoric to meet today's voters "hopes"?

I agree, I would like more nukes. Even hydropower. To hell with the tree frogs and albino crawdads. France has 80% of their electricity from nukes while I think we're stuck at 20%. Nuke could provide hydrogen or electricity. Either way, better than what we have now. Unfortunately, too many politicians are in front of cameras screaming "not in my back yard".

The biofules here in Arkansas are catching on bigtime. Maybe an intermediate step toward nukes and hydrogen.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext