SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JDN who wrote (157)10/27/2006 12:11:30 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) of 10087
 
The economy is NOT kicking butt. That's just a lie. From the beginning, we know Bush's policies are aimed at the top 1%, and those people have benefitted, plus maybe the 1% beneath them and some of the sectors like oil, weapons, drugs, hmo's and developers. Basically all the industries which should be regulated are allowed to do whatever they want under Bush, plus rich tax cheats are not pursued. So they all benefit.

But what about the 97% of the rest of the country? If you think the Bush policies have helepd the average American family, you're out of touch. Health and energy costs have soared 75% under Bush, rent and education have gone up about 50%. Health benefits, wages and job security are all down. So are government services. But the biggest not so hidden dump on the middleclass is Bush's trillions in new debt, which people are going to have to pay off one of these days, just not on Bush's watch.

Also, if you read the news today you see growth and real estate prices are plummeting. Donald Trump said last year that if real estate prices collapse, "look out below", because this economy is heavily mortgaged based on inflated real estate values, and the average consumer is deeper in debt that ever in history. In fact many people have been living off their cheap ARM loans which expire soon.

No, this economy ressembles 1973. And after the Vietnam War we had a long hangover. Also after Reagan we had the long hangover. This was mainly because of huge new debts that had to be paid off. And democrats are for balanced budgets so paying off debt will be one of their priorities. Bush has been borrowing and spending so many trillions. That is completely unsustainable. He should have done it like CLinton did. In fact he should have left Clinton's economic policies exactly as they were. CLinton gave us a boom market with surpluses. Bush's market has not been as good and is largely deficit spending driven. In fact, there is nothong conservative at all about Bush's economic policies, they're really just reckless, a sugar high in the short-term, then a downer.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext