Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 175.07

+2.6%

Dec 3 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (56433)	10/30/2006 9:09:57 AM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (2) of 196825

I wonder if BRCM will be able to stay within the terms of the injunction? I really do think [based on history, which repeats itself] that it may be institutionally incapable of operating cleanly. Maybe, but I think it would be tough to prove. If a sales guy quotes Q's HSDPA standby times during a meeting with LG or Toshiba, how exactly do you prove it? I dont see much coming from this case, unless Q can prove that Broadcom used its source code in the development of its WEDGE/HEDGE products. Perhaps engineer or Clark could comment on the likelihood of that happening and proving it....absent that, this reminds me of the TI breach of confidentiality case. They probably did something wrong, but I doubt they get much more than a slap on the wrist. Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next