SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (52564)10/30/2006 1:52:55 PM
From: mph  Read Replies (2) of 90947
 
fulcruminquiry.com

This is interesting. It concerns a tax decision out of the DC Circuit dealing with whether emotional distress damages in whistleblower or similar cases are actually taxable. The court said no on constitutional grounds.

Since approximately 1986, the taxation of emotional distress awards in employment litigation has often been an impediment to resolution. As I recall, this stemmed from an add on to some bill signed by Clinton at the time. I can't recall who stuck in the provision at the last second.

I wonder if Smithee has encountered this issue in his...ahem...movie career.<g>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext