Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (96416)	11/2/2006 12:43:29 PM
From: Patchie	Read Replies (3) of 122087

Kev...I posted the link because it JUST CAME OUT. New news as of TODAY. Not a change in focus, simply stated, the regulators are starting to catch on to something you all denied existed and where the excuses used to be "Where are the SEC actions if this exists" the cases are now coming fast and furious. As for victimized companies sharing the blame. Wrong. When you go to your mortgage company and refinance your house at a specified contract agreement, does that lender have the right to change that agreement without your knowledge and to basically profit more by stealing your money? Companies go to lenders for financing. Even the big companies still do this. The lenders must follow the laws and the agreements in the contracts. When they do not, it is not the companies fault that the lender violated the laws. The company and shareholders evaluate impacts based on agreements and not based on possibilities of illegal acts. This Blame the Victim argument is getting old and is a shallow position to take.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next