SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : IVAX Insider Trading

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John McCarthy who wrote (70)9/27/1997 8:53:00 PM
From: flickerful   of 756
 
>>>accordingly, we are not attempting
to obtain approval of Paxene(TM) as a generic version of
paclitaxel, but rather have undertaken extensive clinical studies
and have submitted a full New Drug Application for Paxene(TM). Our
studies independently demonstrate the activity of Paxene(TM) for
Kaposi's sarcoma, and support the benefits of dosing schedules
which differ from those approved for TAXOL(R) -- in short, I am
very excited about the clinical results we have obtained. I am
hopeful that, like other non- controversial cancer and AIDS-related
medications, Paxene(TM) will similarly receive an expeditious
review at FDA."


were ivax to apply for generic approval, that date would
have applied. but, from your post, it appears they are
trying to stay on a fast track...applying for a full new
drug designation, relying on an intent to administer paxene
quite differently than taxol.

randy
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext