SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (52853)11/4/2006 3:36:35 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
Saddam's Nuclear Plans

In Iraqi Documents
Little Green Footballs

Ray Robison, who’s been studying the Iraqi documents intensely for quite some time, has interesting information about the NYT article on nuclear sensitive releases at DOD website. (Hat tip: Confederate Yankee.)

<<< What to keep in mind when you read the NYT article.
    Among the dozens of documents in English were Iraqi 
reports written in the 1990s and in 2002 for United
Nations inspectors in charge of making sure Iraq had
abandoned its unconventional arms programs after the
Persian Gulf war. Experts say that at the time, Mr.
Hussein’s scientists were on the verge of building an atom
bomb, as little as a year away.
The Senate Prewar Intelligence Review Phase II report reveals that Saddam’s Foreign Minster told the US government that Saddam was trying to build a bomb. He said Saddam was trying to get uranium and was irate that his nuclear team was taking too long.
    In September 2002, the CIA obtained, from a source, 
information that allegedly came from a high-level Iraqi
official with direct access to Saddam Hussein and his
inner circle. The information this source provided was
considered so important and so sensitive that the CIA’s
Directorate of Operations prepared a highly restricted
intelligence report to alert senior policymakers about the
reporting. Because of the sensitivity, however, that it
was not disseminated to Intelligence Community analysts.
    Concerned that something may have been missed in our first
Iraq review, the Committee began to request additional
information from the Intelligence Community and to
question current and former CIA officers who were involved
in this issue. As noted above, the Committee has not
completed this inquiry, but we have seen the operational
documentation pertaining to this case.
    We can say that there is not a single document related to 
this case which indicates that the source said Iraq had no
WMD programs. On the contrary, all of the information
about this case so far indicates that the information from
this source was that Iraq did have WMD programs.

So what did Saddam’s foreign minister tell the US government? From the report: [emphasis mine]
    The intelligence report conveyed information from the 
source attributed to the Iraqi official which said:
    * Iraq was not in possession of a nuclear weapon. However,
Iraq was aggressively and covertly developing such a
weapon.
Saddam, irate that Iraq did not yet have a nuclear
weapon because money was no object and because Iraq
possessed the scientific know how, had recently called
meeting his Nuclear Weapons Committee.
    * The Committee told Saddam that a nuclear weapon would be
ready within 18-24 months of acquiring the fissile
material.

>>>

UPDATE at 11/3/06 10:07:41 am:

And remember, the legitimacy of this information has now been verified by the New York Times.

captainsquartersblog.com

UPDATE at 11/3/06 10:24:31 am:

Ed Lasky suspects that the NYT’s article was another pre-election hit coordinated with the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency. Note that Ray Robison says in the above-linked post that he notified the IAEA about the documents weeks ago.

americanthinker.com

littlegreenfootballs.com

rayrobison.typepad.com

confederateyankee.mu.nu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext