2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 383.12

+0.8%

Nov 26 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (11251)	11/8/2006 2:45:31 AM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) of 218065

Maurice, you claim that CO2 poorly sequestered at the bottom of the ocean would acidify the surrounding water . . . . . . but this wouldn't be a problem because it would "quickly dissipate". Dissipate to where? You now claim it will not dissipate into the atmosphere. So where is the secret hiding place it will dissipate to? The reproduction and growth of coral reefs, and crustaceans are already declining due to the declining pH of the oceans due to sulfur emissions. Great portions of the Great Barrier are already dying off due to this acidity and increased temperatures. You propose a scheme to worsen these problems. I think the real world is more complex than your simplistic view allows for. .

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next