I'm sorry I re-posted your "mediocrity of thought," i.e "When you list of those who have died in Iraq, they are in the age ranges of 18 to 24 mostly. Now, you could not possibly have a good education for such young volunteers."
But you wrote it, not me. You are just as wrong-headed as you were when you claimed Harold Ford's appearance on CNN was some kind of lovely admirable coup over Fox, when in fact Ford had appeared on Fox. Did I find your apology for that errant analysis here? No.
And, as if you had a clue what you actually write or have written, perhaps you could explain how knowing how to count implies the ability to figure out that 18-23 year old dying soldiers "are" poorly educated? I'll tell you, I "know" 18-23 year old dying soldiers can be quite well educated. You don't appear in any fashion thus far, to know this. Perhaps it's because you can count, I gather, but it makes no sense to me.
I apologize however. After all, you "didn't say" 18-23 year old dying soldiers "must be",poorly educated, you instead correct my characterization to simply say you feel they "are" poorly educated.
Good god, LOL
Dan B. |
