SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kevin Rose who wrote (14665)11/13/2006 6:20:03 PM
From: ManyMoose  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
I can tell you really don't understand the situation, Kevin.

An apodeictic argument can be made that once the sperm fertilizes the egg the potential for a human being is initiated. The argument over when that becomes a baby is no-win situation because the sides can't agree on what constitutes a baby.

The problem with monkeying with the fundamental origins of human existence is the potential for abuse. I don't care how many safeguards you have in place, somebody is going to abuse that knowledge. If you place the boundary in a gray area, there will always be someone trying to push the limits.

It's clear that no potential for a human being exists before the egg and sperm are united, because each has only half the genes necessary.

That is a clear and indisputable line, the abuse of which is easily established.

We have already seen how people can insert genes from a jellyfish into a mouse, and come up with a mouse that glows in the dark. It's only a matter of which genes are inserted where until we have the strange Island of Doctor Moreau on our hands.

Do you understand now?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext