SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kevin Rose who wrote (14665)11/14/2006 12:03:44 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
"Do you truly believe that babies are being killed for embryonic stem cell research?"

Embryo = fertilized = life. Do you really believe that killing life is not killing life? For that matter both sperm and ovum are alive. Killing life for the potential of causing cancer in another being seems like a bad trade off.

"at the start of any line of research, there are often long periods of time before it bears fruit. "

Is it your position that research on adult stem cell research started considerably before research on embryonic stem cells? Intuitively, I would assume that is reversed. It is my belief that embryonic stem cell research was the start and that after it was started people began branching off and researching adult stem cells.

So how much good money does the government have to throw after the private firms' bad money to satisfy?

The debate is not about whether private firms can invest in medical research, it is about whether the government should be forced to fund what private firms are prudent enough to avoid.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext