SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Claude Cormier who wrote (25439)11/14/2006 7:32:15 PM
From: Mr. Aloha  Read Replies (1) of 78409
 
I don't mean the current base metals producers, whose prices would collapse if the metals collapse. I mean preproduction juniors that also have silver/gold, like MMG, which trades at a fraction of what their annual cash flow from zinc alone would be even if zinc collapsed to under $1. IMO, MMG's stock price will still be higher than it is now if zinc is under $1 when it goes to production. If base metal prices collapse, companies like MMG, RMKL, and ADA can shift focus to developing their precious metals.

I prefer the non-gold only stocks because they trade at a discount to the gold only stocks, and their metals are "consumed" rather than "accumulated". LOL. I think we'll eventually run out of some base metals (http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000CEA15-3272-13C8-9BFE83414B7FFE87 ) but we'll never run out of gold (though gold will become much more valuable). I prefer juniors that are pricing in far lower metals prices rather than producers that are closer to fully valued. I focus on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted for risk and time.

If the global economy grows over the long term, base metal prices should stay high and gold and silver should do well, too.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext