American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (14692)	11/15/2006 2:09:23 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) of 71588

If you can show where seeds in the context you refer to is motile, I will consider the questions. Otherwise it is specious. Killing a living organism is just that. Killing is killing. If you kill a baby because it was not enough cells to warrant some arbitrary number it is not significantly different than halfway delivering a baby and then sucking its brains out through a tube. The facts remain that there is no evidence that dead baby stem cells will yield any significant medical breakthrough. If there was people would be quitting their day jobs to get into the field. We would have a stem cell bubble. The movement has been most supported by people who support a woman's desire to kill her baby at any time for any reason. When people can argue for it with medical evidence instead of fraudulent emotional half truths, then it might be worth debate. Trading a life for a chance to create cancer is not a good trade off. "should a majority of a population decide to spend their tax money on promising research that will benefit all?" A mars base would benefit all of mankind. It is a better bet.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next